Search for: All records

Abstract Effective flood prediction supports developing proactive risk management strategies, but its application in ungauged basins faces tremendous challenges due to limited/no streamflow record. This study investigates the potential for integrating streamflow derived from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data and U.S. National Water Model (NWM) reanalysis estimates to develop improved predictions of above-normal flow (ANF) over the coterminous US. Leveraging the SAR data from the Global Flood Detection System to estimate the antecedent conditions using principal component regression, we apply the spatial-temporal hierarchical model (STHM) using NWM outputs for improving ANF prediction. Our evaluation shows promising results with the integrated model, STHM-SAR, significantly improving NWE, especially in 60% of the sites in the coastal region. Spatial and temporal validations underscore the model’s robustness, with SAR data contributing to explained variance by 24% on average. This approach not only improves NWM prediction, but also uniquely combines existing remote sensing data with national-scale predictions, showcasing its potential to improve hydrological modeling, particularly in regions with limited stream gauges. 

Abstract Floods cause hundreds of fatalities and billions of dollars of economic loss each year in the United States. To mitigate these damages, accurate flood prediction is needed for issuing early warnings to the public. This situation is exacerbated in larger model domains flood prediction, particularly in ungauged basins. To improve flood prediction for both gauged and ungauged basins, we propose a spatio‐temporal hierarchical model (STHM) using above‐normal flow estimation with a 10‐day window of modeled National Water Model (NWM) streamflow and a variety of catchment characteristics as input. The STHM is calibrated (1993–2008) and validated (2009–2018) in controlled, natural, and coastal basins over three broad groups, and shows significant improvement for the first two basin types. A seasonal analysis shows the most influential predictors beyond NWM streamflow reanalysis are the previous 3‐day average streamflow and the aridity index for controlled and natural basins, respectively. To evaluate the STHM in improving above‐normal streamflow in ungauged basins, 20‐fold cross‐validation is performed by leaving 5% of sites. Results show that the STHM increases predictive skill in over 50% of sites' by 0.1 Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and improves over 65% of sites' streamflow prediction to an NSE > 0.67, which demonstrates that the STHM is one of the first of its kind and could be employed for flood prediction in both gauged and ungauged basins. 

Abstract With an increasing number of continental‐scale hydrologic models, the ability to evaluate performance is key to understanding uncertainty and making improvements to the model(s). We hypothesize that any model, running a single set of physics, cannot be “properly” calibrated for the range of hydroclimatic diversity as seen in the contenintal United States. Here, we evaluate the NOAA National Water Model (NWM) version 2.0 historical streamflow record in over 4,200 natural and controlled basins using the Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency metric decomposed into relative performance, and conditional, and unconditional bias. Each of these is evaluated in the contexts of meteorologic, landscape, and anthropogenic characteristics to better understand where the model does poorly, what potentially causes the poor performance, and what similarities systemically poor performing areas share. The primary objective is to pinpoint traits in places with good/bad performance and low/high bias. NWM relative performance is higher when there is high precipitation, snow coverage (depth and fraction), and barren area. Low relative skill is associated with high potential evapotranspiration, aridity, moisture‐and‐energy phase correlation, and forest, shrubland, grassland, and imperviousness area. We see less bias in locations with high precipitation, moisture‐and‐energy phase correlation, barren, and grassland areas and more bias in areas with high aridity, snow coverage/fraction, and urbanization. The insights gained can help identify key hydrological factors underpinning NWM predictive skill; enforce the need for regionalized parameterization and modeling; and help inform heterogenous modeling systems, like the NOAA Next Generation Water Resource Modeling Framework, to enhance ongoing development and evaluation.